Difference between selmer reference 54 and 36

The low c# key responds great (now that it has a 'leaf spring'). The neck to body fit is good, but this Ref.

I had its key height custom set-its sound is huge and it's perfectly in tune (well, you'll see). The key fit is good, but it does require medium viscosity key oil to get/keep some of the rattles out (but I do play the heck out of it). The 82Z's engraving is nice, but it lacks the fine detail of the Ref. The 82Z is a very well-built instrument, but its construction is not 'stunning.' It kind of reminds me of a Seiko-perfect timing (playing) but not truly customized.

This Reference 54 alto is truly a scientifically perfected work of art. It has the beauty and construction of a Patek Philippe with the accuracy of an atomic clock. Quite frankly, the horn is perfectly constructed and as cosmetically perfect as any horn I have seen and felt. I also like the front f pearl-cosmetically-it's a nice touch. The f# trill pearl is gorgeous, and the high f# key has an appearance that makes the 82Z's bar almost laughable. The key pop (action) is good (but not equal to or better than my 82Z). The key height is set a little higher that I have seen on other Reference 54s but the sound is huge (and perfectly in tune). The engraving is lovely, the key posts are perfect, the key fit is perfect, the lacquer is unique, and the neck to body fit is beyond a doubt as good as it gets. The Reference 54's construction is simply stunning. By: Benjamin Allen See all of this user's reviews on Apr 05, 2012

Difference between selmer reference 54 and 36